I strongly suspect Americans are deeply uneasy with adolescent sexuality.

Indeed, that seemed obvious to me yesterday when I spent two or three hours watching the Waxman Committee hearing on abstinence-only sexuality eduction. During the hearing, it was mentioned more than once how eight out of every ten Americans want kids to stay celibate through their adolescent years.

Perhaps just as significant, every politician and witness who spoke at the hearing took pains to point out that he or she adamantly preferred adolescents to remain sexually abstinent until — at the very least — they become adults.

So, I feel almost un-American to suggest the primary goal of sex ed ought to be teaching kids to deal in a responsible and healthy way with their sexuality — regardless of whether or not that means abstinence.

I have nothing against abstinence, but I think it should never overshadow health and responsibility.

Hannah, who once lived next door to me, was 17 when she first had sex. Hannah is the sort of person who marches to her own drummer. She was not pressured into sex. Nor did she lightly decide to have sex. Instead, she thought it through and made a careful decision to have sex with her boyfriend. Then she phoned an older friend of hers — a woman in her twenties — to ask for preparation and advice.

Hannah’s friend scheduled a day off from work to take Hannah to Planned Parenthood for birth control, Victoria’s Secrets for lingerie, and lunch for coaching. Armed by her friend’s support, Hannah then “terminated her virginity”, as she put it, “with extreme prejudice.”

Hannah dealt with her sexuality in a responsible and healthy way, as did another young friend of mine. While in his mid teens, Steve passed up one opportunity after another to have sex. As he put it, he was “following his gut, not his gonads.”

When he was 19, he met a woman in her mid-twenties with whom he felt a strong sexual rapport. It turned out the feeling was mutual, though neither one of them was interested in a relationship. His gut finally told him to go ahead. She introduced him to sex, and Steve found the experience beautiful.

So far as I can see, there is nothing necessarily wrong with adolescents having sex, but there is indeed something wrong with anyone — adolescent or not — having irresponsible or unhealthy sex. I think the focus of sexuality education in the United States should be on preparing adolescents to have healthy and responsible sex lives. In other words, rather than focus on teaching sexual abstinence, I would prefer we focused on teaching sexual sanity.

14 Responses to “Teaching Kids Sexual Sanity”

  1. Karen Rayne Says:

    Thanks for your post – some interesting insights you have.

    I want to make one small point correction, though: *Americans * are not deeply suspicious of adolescent sexuality, but *Adult Americans* are deeply suspicious of adolescent sexuality.

    The difference may seem trivial at first, and something of word smithing. Nevertheless, the issue is that it is not, in fact, adolescents themselves that you are talking about here. It’s adults who were themselves, by and large, sexual in one way or another during adolescence, positioning themselves against current adolescent sexuality.

    And yes, sex education should be all about health and responsible decision making. That’s what those words mean. Abstinence-only education does not, in fact, teach anyone how to have sex – even though 99% of humans end up needing to know about responsible sexuality at some point in their lives.

    Come read my daily blog about adolescent sexuality – http://www.karenrayne.com

    Dr. Karen Rayne

  2. Da Frog Says:

    Adolescent abstinence is a myth. During that period all most of us could think about was sex, cars and football. To encourage abstinence over real education is a cheap cop out that is costing us dearly. Instead of accomplishing what it was designed to do teen abstinence instills feelings of guilt.

    Admittedly, I grew up during the age of free love and flower children. Perhaps those of us who grew up during the 1960s should rethink the moronic, puritanical philosophy of today’s sex education. During the teen years everyone’s emotional and sexual urges are the greatest they will ever experience. It is a natural thing.

    I think it is time the old codgers determining our sexual education in this country back off and face reality. Its going to happen and we need to do the best we can to prepare our youth for responsible and safe sex.


  3. Totally agree Paul.

    Interesting blog, Karen! Passed on to my wife as well to pass on to her friend the cool minister’s wife.

    As an adolescent I was lucky enough to stumble on a copy of David Reuben’s Everything You Always Wanted To Know About Sex (but were afraid to ask). It had just come out and was incredibly useful.

    When my girlfriend and I were obviously nearing the tipping point, we went to Planned Parenthood together and loaded up on all the information we could get. PP is awesome and as an aside may I say they have prevented more abortions than all the sign-waving “pro-life” morons in the world put together. We had sex and enjoyed it and didn’t worry so I can look back on the memory with happiness.

  4. Brian Says:

    A totally bizarre situation Paul and a waste of taxpayer money.

  5. Paul Says:

    @ Karen: Great blog you have! I’ve bookmarked it.

    Thanks for the qualification! I have no idea why adult Americans are so uneasy with adolescent sexuality, but I do believe that our unease often translates into a failure to help adolescents develop good sexual habits. When a kid falls into bad habits, it is much more difficult for him or her to change than if he or she got off to a good start in the first place.

    Welcome to the blog!

    @ Da Frog: One of the witnesses in the Waxman hearing was a young woman who went through a “sex ed” class at her school that was designed to do nothing more than instill teens with fear and shame for their own sexuality. Completely pathetic, Frog. Nor did the “sex ed” she went through do much good: Kids were getting knocked up in her class right and left afterwards.

    @ DOF: I read the same book! :)

    That’s an excellent point about Planned Parenthood preventing abortions through education and birth control.

  6. Paul Says:

    Hi Brian! I completely agree. It’s a situation in which good sense has been over-ridden by ideological madness.

  7. chanson Says:

    By crazy coincidence I blogged about the same thing just the other day here. I thought about you because I know you’ve talked about this before…

  8. Paul Says:

    Hi Chanson!! How come you get all the good Google sex queries? About all I get is 1,873 same old queries for “naked girls”. How original is that?

  9. suburbanlife Says:

    Paul – to deny the occurrence of sexual urges and interests during adolescence and not provide opportunity for sensible discussion and guidance is like pretending fire doesn’t exist, is essential, can provide comfort as well as danger. Part of learning to live well, as well-rounded individuals is to take notice of our capacities and utilize them responsibly and to positive ends without undue fanfare. Politicizing sexuality is stupid, in my opinion. G

  10. Paul Says:

    I like your fire analogy, G. That’s much how I see our sexuality too. It can either warm us or burn us, so we must learn to manage it.

    Getting kids off to the right start in managing their sexuality — rather than in simply denying it — is essential for them and for society, in my opinion.

    Part of the problem today is kids face two sources of bad information — one from the the abstinence crowd and one from the promiscuity crowd.

    The abstinence crowd wants to tell them to deny their sexuality and keep them in the dark about any way of managing it. The promiscuity crowd wants them to believe anything goes.

    I don’t think kids are served well by either crowd.

  11. Nova Says:

    Doesnt the US government have the indulgence in sex by minors listed down as an offence?

  12. Paul Says:

    For the most part, Nova, those are state laws rather than Federal ones. So far as I’m aware, every state has its own statutory rape laws, which are laws against having sex with someone who is under a certain age. The specifics vary by state.

  13. anonymous Says:

    To Da Frog who said “Adolescent abstinence is a myth,”

    I have a hard time with this statement. I can see that society expects teenagers to be promiscuous, and while it’s true that many are, there are also many teens out there who are not having sex; and I’m saddened when I hear people put a sexually-active label on the whole of society.

    I happen to be one of many who chose to remain abstinent throughout my teens, and into my twenties…Tho it may seem old-fashioned, I will not have sex until I am married.

    But I do not believe that sexual abstinence = sexual sanity. Indeed, many abstinent people become repressed, unable to talk about sex in a healthy way, and become vulnerable to sexual addiction.

    So I can agree with Paul’s point on the necessity of encouraging and allowing teenagers to actually talk about sex in a healthy way–and to safe people–Whether they’re sexually active or not.

  14. Paul Says:

    Hi Anonymous! Thank you for some excellent comments!

    I would suggest the governing principle here is that a person should not have sex until they are prepared and comfortable having sex. In other words, be true to yourself. And be true to yourself even when that means remaining a virgin.

    I also agree with you that abstinence risks repression. But that, too, can be managed — as I know because I’ve chosen to be celibate this past decade. Any decent sexuality education will not only teach abstinence as an option, but will also teach how to manage abstinence.

    Welcome to the blog!

Leave a Reply